American Public School
American public school funding is primarily concentrated within locals and state expenditures. However, federal sources contribute to the education system. The policy of funding is known as (k–12). The schools differ according to the affluence of the community. This should be eliminated, and the funding has to be done by the country from the general tax revenue. This will ensure the quality and equality in the sector of education. Every child has the right to quality education. Every potential child should be given equal opportunities with equal funding from the general taxes. Students should not be hindered from achieving the set of goals due to the funds shortage. Regardless of who is financing public education, schools that receive the money should not be required to adhere to the demands set forth by the financiers. The schools should receive money with ‘no strings attached’. The reason for that is for the teachers not to fake grades and not to produce unqualified students. Students should not attain high grades that they do not own. If so, they will be unable to perform basic mathematics, and lack general knowledge to handle daily responsibilities. The schools should produce quality students, sharing the knowledge depending on the students’ abilities.
The current funding system (i.e. local taxes, supported with state and federal funds) is not the most effective way to achieve high academic proficiency. Differences in tax revenues produce strikingly unequal school budgets. Many researchers suggest that this produces differences in schooling such that, many students do not have adequate resources to learn effectively. Therefore, they do not attain academic proficiency. The current funding system adversely impacts non-wealthy school districts. The reason for that is they do not have the ability to raise good funds and employ qualified teachers. Also, oftentimes the size of the class is too large and this in one of the reasons that cause poor school performance.
No Child Left Behind is a heavily debated topic. For example, proponents suggest that there are more choices for parents and increased accountability closes the achievement gaps. In contrast, opponents argue that the law forces teachers in a strict teaching style and standardized testing limits the amount and quality of knowledge students receive. All in all, the NCLB legislation is an effective strategy to reduce the achievement gap that exists. This way, the qualified teachers will be given the right job. The annual test is also a professional tool to determine the students’ ability. The good part is that it considers the race, ethnicity and the social economic status of the students. The adequate yearly progress goals are also an important tool to improve the school performance. However, the NCLB is only effective for particular social groups in helping them achieve academic proficiency. This policy will only cater for the students from the affluent communities. The reason for that is the schools are highly structured and they have the ability to attract the qualified teachers resulting into professional teaching. They have enough structures where they only accommodate the right number of students in one class. This is highly reflected in the final results.
No Child Left Behind is specifically for grades K-12. However, there has been discussion of using the same techniques for colleges and universities. The federal government should not exert influence on academic proficiency at the college level; the level of proficiency is varied and depends on the individuals’ abilities and interests. Exacting the policy at the college level will mean curtailing the students from moving to other sections of the country to acquire education as it will be termed to be equal in the whole state. College students should be allowed to attend the schools of their choice according to their abilities. This technique will actually be beneficial to the affluent, since they have been able to set the required structures and regulations in place; from now on the government will be only assisting them to ensure that their children achieve what is required of them. However, it will be detrimental to the students from humble backgrounds. Schools in poor communities are not in a position to attract qualified teachers, and the number of students in one class remains high. This affects the end results.