Future Directions of Fighting Crime
It is important to focus on future directions of fighting crime. The ten percent factor is important as far as crime fighting is concerned. It is important to focus on the limited resources in fighting crime. Ten percent of the criminals in the society cause 50% of the entire crime committed, 10% of the victims are responsible for victimization reported and 10% of areas with crime account for 60% of the entire crime. In this case, it is important to focus on the top most 10% of persons, activities and places where crime is greatest (Gouldner, 2007). This will reduce crime in the society in a great way. Additionally, depositing best practices in future is significant in crime reduction. This includes documenting outstanding examples of departments which have successfully fought crime. This will help the society to learn effective methods used in fighting crime. The strategies will be shared among members of the society and give a chance for innovation of new strategies (Hogg & Brown, 2010).
Smart Crime Analysis which is also referred to asCompStat is another future direction of fighting crime is concerned. It is of great significance to understand crime and accept that it exists. In this case, analysis of past crime statistics is essential. The CompStat philosophy analyzes crime from an entirely reporting mechanism that enhances the process using the basic statistical investigation to direct resources and predicts criminal activities. Criminology department should implement new technologies which will increase efficiency and effectiveness levels of employees. This is achieved through implementation of innovative technologies that are capable of improving crime solvability scale and criminal investigations. The COPLINK software is one of the innovative technologies that is capable of scanning databases for connections to crime (Gouldner, 2007).
Cooperation with the criminal justice system partners should be enhanced as it increases efforts of fighting with crime. This basically means that, all departments concerned should work together as team. A single department cannot fight criminology on its own. Therefore, partnership and cooperation has to be enhanced in future fight against criminology. On the other hand, community involvement on the fight should be enhanced (Hogg & Brown, 2010). It is important for the departments concerned to aggressively practice community-based policies within the local area. This helps involve the community in the strategies applied. The society has indigenous knowledge and information concerning crime in the location concerned. Therefore, working with the community will reduce crime and increase security.
Perceptibly, it is really hard to underestimate the hardship in bringing about sorts of change, particularly at an organizational level. It is as well very essential to remain aware of the harms of romanticism and idealism when inviting for social alterations. All the same Jim Ife (2000) highlighted that, if basic institutional alterations is to be attained, it will need the active incorporations of various sections of community that include academics in a pledge to advancing social actions. Widespread and sustained programs of communal advocacy and action are integral to a process like that. In a current volume of a journal in Australian,Just Policy,majority of social community social advocates, work academics, activists highlighted means in which alterations could be attained through bottom-up, local initiatives and broad-based oppositional activities. Such alterations are observed as part of an overarching programs aimed at attaining fundamental alterations in current organizational arrangements (Braithwaite, 2006). Whatever the difficulties of this approach it has however moved essentially from the paralysis of analysis that often accompanies hypothesizing in criminology. It might also enable critical criminologists to fatally consider the longer term procedures of social alterations proposed by Cohen (Cohen, 2005).
Several Crime Fighting Methodologies
There is several crime fighting methodologies which can be used in reducing crime. These include; DNA collection programs, cybercrime spyware implementation and use of biometrics. DNA is usually used to resolve crimes in various means. In the case where suspects are identified, a fine sample of the persons’ DNA is compared to real evidence from crime scenes. The ultimate results of this kind of comparison might help institute whether suspects committed the offense. In the case where suspects had not yet been known, biological facts from crime scenes may be compared and analyzed to offender outline in DNA records to assist identify suspects. Biometrics are utilized in such cases to properly analyze and measure the biological information that it is been offered, This knowledge is able to measure various aspects of humans body like, DNA, eye retinas fingerprints and irises, facial patterns, hand measurements and voice patterns. Other types of crime combating technique are utilized by the FBI. With the utilization of Cyber-crime spywares that are located into the processor of suspects without monitors and detection what they perform and finds unconsciously if they conduct a crime through the internet. For instance, such types of programs are known as the Internet and Computer Address Verifier. They have has been utilized by the FBI from the year 2004. An ingenious means of catching law breakers who carry out cybercrimes, these programs has halted hundreds of thousands of criminals that were lurking on the World Wide Web. It is well known that, various crime scene facts can also be associated to other crimes scenarios via the usage of DNA database (Braithwaite, 2006).
In conclusion, reorientations in the way of social advocacy and action would have important insinuation at the stages of theory, practice and policy. While there is enough space to explore such implications, the main point is that, if grave criminology is to eliminate several of the political inertia and theoretical errors of the precedent, then an important basic rethinking of its direction political is necessary. This does not guarantee creating other spheres of criminological investigations outside the common concern of the authority, rather than acknowledging that, the most appropriate means of creating about change including alterations to the culture of crime controls may be through big active involvement with social actions through scholarship, research teaching, advocacy and social activism.