The Social Construction
The social construction is the process where people’s perception concerning realities is formed by the larger biased meaning which they give to experiences. Such created in a social manner personal experiences sometimes share little on the reality. It is also alleged that human being applies any of the available subjective meaning to the experiences and existence of its own. Regardless of what a person may think about a situation, it all together becomes an actual state of things to people; thus, any kind of either positive or negative aspect is attached to the realities of life. And the important part of it is its incorporation of human’s wide range concept, which concerns its main focus in the social work (Andersen & Taylor, 2008).
The human and gender expectations are capable of producing emotions, work role, and behavior. Gender construction looks at social process by assuming the traditional facts assumed and the expectations together with perception curved can be changed (Ransome, 2010). On the other hand, sex is seen as different when comparing two groups of men and women. Though women tend to exercise their corporate leadership, men have personalities that are more hierarchical giving a structured in the traditional setting. The changing world has seen a transformation in ideas and differences in sexuality and gender behaviors and the various paths followed. Therefore, gender has been viewed as a response to power or authority in major institution where leadership is significant (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2010).
Carole Vance implies the social construction as a theory with outrage ideas, whose thinking is changeable, and that is based on the human history and actions instead of the body and sexual drives. The process has become more influential with changed framework for sex history. The theory is drawn on the basis of several developmental disciplines, interractionism and the deviant sociology. The doctrines also respond to the questions of feminism that regards the gender and identity. Feminist scholarship on gender was focused on the reproduction related to sexuality and women’s subordination. The importance of the social theories is for the appreciation of the fact that though institutions and theorists are more interested in the practices which fall under social actors, and the manner in which they can be affected, and the experiences they may have differing significantly as a result of gender and the sex (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2010).
The Distinction of Gender and Sexuality
The distinction of gender and sexuality is based on the fact gender is that, which differentiates gestures, tools, times, the ability in terms of the capability to perform a given duty and other related perceptions associated with male. Gender is not able to be forfeited without subject to the culture which tries to alienate a woman (female) from a man (male) for the limited material. Sexuality is the term resulting from the concept of sex-based anatomical dissection of the reproductive organs which carries connotations dichotomy distinguishing men from female. The differences have given rise to the psychological contemporary with most theoretical approaches causing the existence of gender identities on the perspectives of relationships and the society. Besides basing the dissimilarities on the group and social factors, the biological scientists have always focused their research on sex while the constructionists concentrate it on the gender with an intention to distinguish the two.
Finally, the construction theories are important tools, which account for the race, sexuality, and gender among others that make day to day challenges of the assumption in regard to what is natural. The challenging issues are the diverse multiplicity of the term social construction that over times has tried to reduce the implications in the context of discipline and other related situations.
